Reasonable care? Some comments on Gillett's Reasonable Care.

Crisp R

A discussion of some issues from Grant Gillett's book Reasonable Care. At the metaethical level, Gillett's views about the origin, scope and bindingness of morality are outlined and criticised. Against him it is argued that (a) moral capacity does not follow from linguistic abilitiy, (b) things can matter to non-concept-users and (c) universalisability arguments fail to show that immorality is irrational. At the first order level, Gillett's arguments against surrogacy and euthanasia are answered.

Keywords:

Animals

,

Humans

,

Terminal Care

,

Euthanasia

,

Euthanasia, Active

,

Euthanasia, Active, Voluntary

,

Euthanasia, Passive

,

Stress, Psychological

,

Communication

,

Empathy

,

Physician-Patient Relations

,

Morals

,

Ethics

,

Personal Autonomy

,

Animal Rights

,

Coercion

,

Freedom

,

Bioethical Issues

,

Bioethics

,

Ethical Analysis

,

Wedge Argument

,

Physicians

,

Netherlands

,

Female

,

United Kingdom

,

Gestational Carriers